Ethics Case Study:
The Boeing 737 Max Crisis

Background:

​

The Boeing 737 Max crisis is a significant case in business ethics, focusing on the events leading up to and following two tragic crashes that occurred within five months of each other, resulting in the deaths of 346 people. The first crash involved Lion Air Flight 610 in October 2018, which crashed into the Java Sea shortly after takeoff from Jakarta, Indonesia, killing all 189 passengers and crew. The second crash involved Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 in March 2019, which crashed near Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, killing all 157 people on board.

​

Both crashes were linked to the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), an automated flight control system designed to prevent the plane from stalling by pushing the nose down if the system detected an imminent stall. However, the system was prone to erroneous activation due to faulty sensor data, and pilots were not adequately trained or informed about the system’s behavior, leading to catastrophic consequences.

​

Boeing had developed the 737 Max to compete with the Airbus A320neo, promising airlines improved fuel efficiency and lower operating costs. To expedite the plane’s entry into the market, Boeing made several critical decisions that compromised safety.

 

These included:

​

Rushed Development: Boeing accelerated the development timeline to match Airbus’s market schedule, leading to insufficient testing and risk assessments.

 

Regulatory Evasion: Boeing worked closely with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to streamline the certification process, leveraging the FAA’s Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) program, which allowed Boeing to self-certify many aspects of the aircraft’s safety.

 

Lack of Pilot Training: To minimize costs for airlines, Boeing downplayed the significance of MCAS and did not require simulator training for pilots transitioning from earlier 737 models to the 737 Max. This lack of training left pilots unprepared to handle MCAS malfunctions.

 

Inadequate Disclosure: Boeing did not fully disclose the existence of MCAS or its potential risks to airlines, pilots, and regulators, contributing to the confusion and mishandling of the system during emergencies.

​

The aftermath of the crashes led to intense scrutiny of Boeing’s practices, revealing systemic issues in its corporate culture that prioritized profit and market competition over safety and transparency. The crisis resulted in the global grounding of the 737 Max fleet in March 2019, substantial financial losses for Boeing, and a profound impact on its reputation. Investigations uncovered alarming details about Boeing’s internal processes and the FAA’s oversight, prompting calls for regulatory reform and changes in industry practices.

​

The fallout included multiple lawsuits, congressional hearings, and criminal investigations. In January 2021, Boeing agreed to pay $2.5 billion to settle a criminal charge of conspiracy to defraud the FAA. The settlement included compensation for airlines, victims’ families, and a fine. The crisis also led to significant changes in Boeing’s leadership, with CEO Dennis Muilenburg resigning in December 2019.

​

Key Players:​

• Dennis Muilenburg: CEO of Boeing during the crisis.

• Kevin McAllister: President and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes during the crisis.

• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): The regulatory body responsible for the certification of aircraft in the United States.

• Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines: The airlines involved in the fatal crashes.

 

Timeline of Events:

​

August 2011:

Boeing announces the development of the 737 Max to compete with the Airbus A320neo.

 

October 29, 2018:

Lion Air Flight 610 crashes into the Java Sea, killing all 189 people on board.

 

March 10, 2019:

Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashes near Addis Ababa, killing all 157 people on board.

 

March 13, 2019:

The FAA grounds all Boeing 737 Max aircraft, followed by other aviation authorities worldwide.

 

April 2019:

Dennis Muilenburg testifies before Congress, admitting to mistakes but defends Boeing’s safety culture.

 

December 2019:

Dennis Muilenburg resigns as CEO amid mounting pressure.

 

January 2021:

Boeing agrees to pay $2.5 billion to settle a criminal charge related to conspiracy to defraud the FAA.

 

Ethical Issues:

• Safety vs. Profit: Boeing prioritized speed to market and cost savings over thorough safety testing and pilot training.

• Transparency and Disclosure: Boeing failed to fully disclose the MCAS system’s risks to pilots and regulators.

• Regulatory Oversight: The FAA’s certification process was compromised by over-reliance on Boeing’s self-assessments.

• Corporate Responsibility: Boeing's handling of the crisis raised questions about its commitment to safety and accountability.

​

Analysis Questions:

​

1) Do you think the corporate culture at Boeing was the primary driver behind the unethical behavior of its employees? Why or why not?

​​

2) In your opinion, who should bear the most responsibility for the crashes - Boeing's executives, the engineers, the FAA, or all parties equally? Explain your reasoning.

​​

3) What steps do you think Boeing should take to rebuild trust with airlines, pilots, regulators, and the public? Are their efforts so far sufficient?

​​

4) How do you think aviation regulatory bodies should adjust their oversight and certification processes to prevent similar incidents in the future?

​​

5) Do you think the Boeing 737 Max crisis will have a long-term impact on the aviation industry’s approach to safety and corporate governance? Why or why not?